Knowledge-based System Design Based on Generic Method Conception

Henrihs Gorskis, Arkady Borisov


This paper proposes an approach to generic object concepts for problem solving method ontologies and knowledge- based systems. By using placeholders, whose main purpose is to define characteristics of the objects upon which the method acts without specifying a domain, method ontologies can become more reusable. The re-usability stems from the ability to merge such method ontologies more easily with fitting domains. The generic object concepts in the method are proposed to be used as a bridge to the domain ontology. The paper provides a comparison to similar methods in related studies.


Domain ontology; intelligent system; problem solving method; reusable components

Full Text:



T. E. Rothenfluh, J. H. Gennari, H. Eriksson, A. R. Puerta, S. W. Tu and M. A. Musen, “Reusable Ontologies, Knowledge-Acquisition Tools, and Performance Systems. Protégé-II Solutions to Sisyphus-2” in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2002, pp. 303–332.

B. Chandrasekaran, “Generic Tasks in Knowledge-Based Reasoning: High-Level Building Blocks for Expert System Design,” IEEE Expert, vol. 1, Issue 3, 1986, pp. 23–30.

C. Torniai, M. H. Brush, N. Vasilevsky, E. Segerdell, M. Wilson, T. Johnson, K. Corday, C. Shaffer and M. Haendel “Developing an Application Ontology for Biomedical Resource Annotation and Retrieval: Challenges and Lessons Learned,” in ICBO, 2011.

N. K. Leung, S. K. Lau, J. Fan and N. Tsang, “An integration-oriented ontology development methodology to reuse existing ontologies in an ontology development process,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services. ACM. December 2011, pp. 174–181.

D. Lonsdale, D. W. Embley, Y. Ding, L. Xu and M. Hepp, “Reusing ontologies and language components for ontology generation” in Data & Knowledge Engineering , vol. 69, no. 4, 2010, pp. 318–330.

E. Simperl, “Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study” in Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 68, no. 10, 2009, pp. 905–925.

J. J. Jung, “Reusing ontology mappings for query routing in semantic peer-to-peer environment,” in Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 17, 2010, pp. 3248–3257.

W. Yao, A. Kumar, “CONFlexFlow: Integrating Flexible clinical pathways into clinical decision support systems using context and rules” in Decision Support Systems, vol. 55, no. 2, 2013, pp. 499–515.

J. H. Gennari, W. Grosso, M. Musen, “A Method-Description Language: An initial ontology with examples”. Stanford Medical Informatics. 1998, pp. 1–18.

J. Cantais, D. Dominguez, V. Gigante, L. Laera, V. Tamma, “An example of food ontology for diabetes control”. Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference 2005 workshop on Ontology Patterns for the Semantic Web. 2005, pp. 1–9.

J. Graça, M. Mourão, O. Anunciação, P. Monteiro, H. S. Pinto, V. Loureiro, “Ontology building process: The wine domain” in: Proc. of the 5 th Conf. of EFITA. 2005, pp. 1138 – 1145.

J. Henß, J. Kleb, S. Grimm, “A Protégé 4 Backend for Native OWL Persistence,” 11th Intl. Protégé Conference, June 23–26, 2009, pp. 1–4.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2014 Henrihs Gorskis, Arkady Borisov

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.